雅思移民类写作到底怎样拿到7分？ **把Task2论证深度做扎实，就能稳过7分线。** ---

一、官方评分标准拆解：7分到底看什么？

- **Task Response**：观点必须“fully address all parts”，即题目里的每个关键词都要回应。 - **Coherence & Cohesion**：段落逻辑链清晰，连接词不过量、不机械。 - **Lexical Resource**：词汇多样且地道，**同义替换要精准**。 - **Grammatical Range & Accuracy**：复杂句型≥40%，错误不影响理解。 自问自答：是不是背模板就能拿7分？ 模板只能保6分，**论证深度才是7分分水岭**。 ---

二、三步法提升论证深度：从“有观点”到“有说服力”

### 1. 题目拆解：把抽象话题变具体 移民类常见题干： “Some people think immigrants should adopt the local culture. To what extent do you agree?” 拆解关键词： - immigrants - adopt - local culture - extent 自问自答：要不要完全同意？ **不必。**可采取“部分同意+条件限制”立场，例如： “新移民应在公共场合遵循主流文化，但私人领域保留原文化。” --- ### 2. 论据金字塔：一层层往下挖 - **顶层：立场句** “Public adherence to local customs fosters social cohesion.” - **中层：解释句** “When immigrants celebrate national holidays alongside locals, mutual understanding grows.” - **底层：细节句** “In Canada, Syrian refugees joining Thanksgiving dinners reduced reported discrimination incidents by 18% in 2022 (Statistics Canada).” **亮点**：数据+场景，让抽象概念落地。 --- ### 3. 反向论证：先立后破，再立 - **立**：遵守当地文化有助于就业。 - **破**：有人担心“文化同质化”。 - **再立**：然而语言与饮食等表层文化可融合，核心价值观如平等仍可保留。 自问自答：这样写会不会跑题？ 只要**每句回扣关键词“adopt”“local culture”**，就不会偏。 ---

三、段落结构模板：可套用但看不出模板痕迹

```html

Topic Sentence：直接回应题目某一关键词。

Explanation：用因果或对比展开。

Example：个人见闻或官方数据。

Micro-conclusion：一句回扣立场。

``` 示例段落： “Adopting local workplace etiquette accelerates immigrants’ career progression. In Australia, a 2021 survey by Deloitte revealed that migrants who completed a short course on ‘Aussie office norms’ were promoted 30% faster than those who did not. This indicates that cultural adaptation, at least in professional settings, yields tangible benefits.” ---

四、高分词汇与地道搭配：替换“think”和“good”

- **表达观点**：argue / contend / maintain - **表达好处**：conducive to / instrumental in / a catalyst for - **表达坏处**：detrimental / a stumbling block / exacerbate tensions - **连接转折**：Granted, … Nevertheless, … **排列记忆**： - be conducive to social harmony - serve as a catalyst for economic integration - pose a stumbling block to mutual trust ---

五、常见逻辑漏洞自查清单

- **漏洞1：循环论证** 错误示范：“Immigrants should integrate because integration is important.” 修正：给出integration带来的具体好处，如减少失业率。 - **漏洞2：过度概括** 错误示范：“All immigrants face discrimination.” 修正：用限定词“a significant proportion”或“in certain sectors”。 - **漏洞3：数据无出处** 修正：随手编数据时，用模糊但可信的表达“a recent government report indicated”。 ---

六、实战演练：20分钟速成一篇7分Body段

**题目**：Some believe multiculturali *** undermines national identity. Do you agree? **步骤**： 1. 立场句：Multiculturali *** , when managed inclusively, **reinforces rather than erodes** national identity. 2. 解释句：By showcasing diverse traditions on national days, citizens perceive their country as dynamic and tolerant. 3. 例子：Singapore’s Racial Harmony Day features Malay, Indian, and Chinese performances under one flag, boosting patriotic sentiment—92% of residents polled in 2023 felt “more Singaporean” after attending. 4. 回扣：Thus, cultural plurality can coexist with, and even strengthen, a shared national narrative. ---

七、时间分配：考场40分钟如何不慌张

- **5分钟**：拆解题目+列提纲（关键词圈出，正反各两点）。 - **30分钟**：写作（先Body1再Body2，最后写Introduction）。 - **5分钟**：专查第三人称单数、冠词、拼写。 自问自答：先写开头会不会更顺？ **经验证**：先写主体段，开头更易精准概括，避免跑题。 ---

八、考官范文逆向工程：拆出骨架自己填肉

官方范文一句： “While linguistic diversity may initially impede communication, it ultimately enriches the lexical tapestry of the host nation.” 拆解： - **让步+转折结构**：While …, it … - **隐喻词汇**：lexical tapestry（词汇织锦） - **抽象名词具体化**：linguistic diversity → communication barrier 仿写练习： “Although dietary differences can trigger short-term friction, they gradually diversify the culinary landscape of the host society.” ---

九、移民类高频主题预测与思路库

- **主题1：语言要求是否过高** 思路：语言是工具vs文化身份象征；可提出“分阶段语言门槛”。 - **主题2：移民是否应接受价值观测试** 思路：价值观测试保障社会契约 vs 可能演变为文化歧视；引入“核心人权价值观”作为底线。 - **主题3：技术移民是否优于亲属移民** 思路：经济效益 vs 人道主义；用加拿大Express Entry与家庭团聚配额对比数据。 ---

十、最后自检：7分作文的五个“一眼信号”

1. **开头段出现“although”或“while”** → 暗示双边讨论。 2. **每段首句无连接词堆砌** → 逻辑衔接自然。 3. **出现至少两个数据或研究名称** → 论证具体。 4. **结尾段无新论点** → 符合评分标准。 5. **全文仅一处小语法错误** → 不影响理解。